Comments on: another nsopenssl-related memory leak fixed! http://dossy.org/2005/03/another-nsopensslrelated-memory-leak-fixed/ Everything that comes out of Dossy, from the strange to the banal. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:35:37 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Dossy http://dossy.org/2005/03/another-nsopensslrelated-memory-leak-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-99 Dossy Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:22:37 +0000 http://dossy.org/archives/000108.html#comment-99 At this point, I would suggest just using the tip of the aolserver_v40_bp branch -- eventually, that will be tagged and released as AOLserver 4.0.11. Side-effects of setting "keepalivetimeout" to 0? Just that, well, HTTP Keep-Alive will be disabled. This might result in a small performance impact, as clients will need to initiate full TCP connections to the server per HTTP request rather than reusing an existing connection. This is likely to be a non-issue in real-world sites, though. At this point, I would suggest just using the tip of the aolserver_v40_bp branch — eventually, that will be tagged and released as AOLserver 4.0.11.

Side-effects of setting “keepalivetimeout” to 0? Just that, well, HTTP Keep-Alive will be disabled. This might result in a small performance impact, as clients will need to initiate full TCP connections to the server per HTTP request rather than reusing an existing connection. This is likely to be a non-issue in real-world sites, though.

]]> By: Rocael Hernandez http://dossy.org/2005/03/another-nsopensslrelated-memory-leak-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Rocael Hernandez Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:14:44 +0000 http://dossy.org/archives/000108.html#comment-98 It is possible to use aolserver/nsd/driver.c with the memory leak fixed with the actual 4.0.10 distro? Also, what side effects might carry?: ns_param keepalivetimeout 0 It is possible to use aolserver/nsd/driver.c with the memory leak fixed with the actual 4.0.10 distro?

Also, what side effects might carry?:
ns_param keepalivetimeout 0

]]>