<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dossy&#8217;s hCard, if you care about microformats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dossy.org/2006/06/dossys-hcard-if-you-care-about-microformats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dossy.org/2006/06/dossys-hcard-if-you-care-about-microformats/</link>
	<description>Everything that comes out of Dossy, from the strange to the banal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:35:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Havard</title>
		<link>http://dossy.org/2006/06/dossys-hcard-if-you-care-about-microformats/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>John Havard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 03:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dossy.org/archives/000288.html#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Now this is what the Semantic Web is really all about.  Rather than &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;LOL LETS CREATE A NEW XML SCHEMA ROFLOL ke ke ke ke ke AND XSLT AND STUFF LOL&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; it uses the predominant document format on the web (html) and gives meaning to various combinations of tags and standardized classes.

This is something I&#039;ve done as long as I&#039;ve known about CSS, which was back in 1999.  Granted, I didn&#039;t formalize anything, but it was blatantly obvious.  If I wrote the CMS or blog engine and I designed the layout, the class and id tags gave meaning to the document sections.  I&#039;d be a much happier man if browsers implemened &lt;tt&gt;:even&lt;/tt&gt; and &lt;tt&gt;:odd&lt;/tt&gt;.

&lt;strong&gt;XML religous disclaimer:&lt;/strong&gt;  Don&#039;t get me wrong, using an internal xml format and xslt can be useful (e.g. you need to transform from your internal format to xhtml, html 4.1, html 3, and wml).  But there&#039;s probably saner and more efficient solutions.  The worst simple string matching template systems are usually more performant than the fastest formal XSLT engine, and don&#039;t even think about using proper document validation.  Like everything, it has its proper place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is what the Semantic Web is really all about.  Rather than <strong><em>LOL LETS CREATE A NEW XML SCHEMA ROFLOL ke ke ke ke ke AND XSLT AND STUFF LOL</em></strong> it uses the predominant document format on the web (html) and gives meaning to various combinations of tags and standardized classes.</p>
<p>This is something I&#8217;ve done as long as I&#8217;ve known about CSS, which was back in 1999.  Granted, I didn&#8217;t formalize anything, but it was blatantly obvious.  If I wrote the CMS or blog engine and I designed the layout, the class and id tags gave meaning to the document sections.  I&#8217;d be a much happier man if browsers implemened <tt>:even</tt> and <tt> <img src='http://dossy.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> dd</tt>.</p>
<p><strong>XML religous disclaimer:</strong>  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, using an internal xml format and xslt can be useful (e.g. you need to transform from your internal format to xhtml, html 4.1, html 3, and wml).  But there&#8217;s probably saner and more efficient solutions.  The worst simple string matching template systems are usually more performant than the fastest formal XSLT engine, and don&#8217;t even think about using proper document validation.  Like everything, it has its proper place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.430 seconds -->
