I’m guessing that mentally healthy people seek success. However, many of us fail. Should we give up trying? As a geek, I love to explore theory and engage in thought experiments. Here’s one: can success be attained through brute force? I think so, yes.
In any scenario where the chance has a non-zero probability of occurring, it must be attainable through brute force. It’s this fact that makes books like Malcolm Gladwell’s “Blink” (buy it on Amazon.com) valuable–it realizes the truth in the statement “success and failure come from action, nothing comes from inaction.” Scott Adams suggests choosing actions for Complicated Decisions by not trying to choose the right decision but at least the knowably rational one. Again, this helps avoid analysis paralysis which often leads to inaction. You’re almost no longer interested in making the decision that leads to success but rather just making some rational decision that leads to learning, which iteratively enables you to make different rational decisions in the future.
The key is to avoid insanity (”repeating the same action expecting different results”). Brute force success doesn’t come from repeating the same decisions or actions–it depends on trying every possible input until the desired output occurs. Just as theoretically unbreakable encryption must be defeatable through brute force in theory (although, in practice it could be infeasibe due to time, cost or other constraints), success must be achievable by brute force, in theory.
Of course, as a pragmatist, I have to ask myself, “How does this theory help us, in practice?” I believe the answer lies in the necessary traits involved in achieving brute force success: rationality, tenacity, resiliency and skepticism. Rationality and skepticism are critical because they will prevent insanity and yield the best next actions. Tenacity and resiliency are critical because they are necessary in order to sustain the process. Does this mean that everyone who exhibits these traits will eventually succeed? No, because there are other practical limits to brute force (time, cost, etc.) as well. But, I’m guessing, these people are statistically more likely to succeed where others have failed in cases where the brute force approach is the optimal path to success.
What then does this mean for people who lack these traits? Are these innate or genetic, are they environmentally formed, or can they be taught and learned? I have no answer, but my instinct tells me they are indeed learned but through both genetics and environment, some learn them as a side-effect of other processes. (I’d appreciate citations of any affirming or contradicting scientific evidence, if you have it.)
What do you think? Can some successes be achieved through simple brute force methods? Could all successes fundamentally be the product of what is essentially a brute force method, even if externally they appear to be skill-based or even luck-based successes? When you have succeeded at something, to what do you generally attribute your ability to succeed? How do you isolate and identify your failures in order to avoid making them again?
Go ahead and share your thoughts in the comments below!
Tags:
philosophy,
psychology,
success,
failure,
rationality,
skepticism,
tenacity,
resiliency
![[RSS]](http://dossy.org/wp/wp-content/themes/dossyblog-10/art/feed-icon-16x16.png){kind=icon}
November 19th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
xy: If you tell me what distribution and version you're interested in, I can try building x86_64 binaries.
November 19th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Ash: You're right, that's the only actual meaningful measurement - one person's performance before and after. It makes sense that Dvorak ...
November 19th, 2009 at 11:35 am
Has anyone successfully created a x86_64 build of convcharcount.la and convcharcount.so? I'd love to use this plugin, but not ...
November 19th, 2009 at 4:01 am
[...] The original posting is from Dossy’s Blog: What is GIMP’s equivalent of Photoshop’s Median filter? [...]
November 19th, 2009 at 1:30 am
I think the only way to solve this argument is for as many people as possible to list their typing ...