Comments on: Sarah Palin is 2008’s Dan Quayle

By: steve

steve — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:24:06 +0000

both parties promise different means to the same end, yet fail to consider that what we want are different ends.

at least i can cut my losses with some entertainment.

By: Dossy Shiobara

Dossy Shiobara — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:02:47 +0000

See, Steve, that’s exactly what I mean! Given the choice, we wanna see the Hockey Grandma star in an “Alaskan Governors Gone Wild” video, no matter how poor of a choice of leadership she might be.

I don’t care that when Obama’s President, he’ll put an end to email spam, make all porn sites 100% free, we’ll all have high-speed fiber to the desktop, blah, blah blah … what we all want to see is what’s behind Palin’s “Green Door.”

And that is how McCain’s going to become the next President of the United States. God help us all.

By: steve

steve — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:29:57 +0000

by the way, just to be clear, i’m not voting for mccain palin.. not voting for obama biden either. but of the two, lets take the moose gutter.

By: steve

steve — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:29:05 +0000

44% of americans think the american system is irreparably damaged and will continually decline with current the two-party system.

5% of americans vote for something other than the two parties.

it doesn’t matter how stupid sarah is.

all that matters is she can gut a moose, and that’s different, and right now, i’ll take anything different that i can get.