I hereby give myself permission to blog

Dossy Shiobara — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:55:11 +0000

My Twitter friend Brett tweeted something that I’ve been feeling and struggling with for months and months now. Basically, that there are times where I want to say something “out loud” to my social network, but I know I’ll need more than the 140 characters that will fit in a tweet, but it doesn’t feel large enough to blog about. I end up just “eating” the thought and it never escapes my head, but it’ll bother me for days, because of that need to get it out.

So, I’d like to try a little experiment. I’m giving myself “permission” to write those thoughts out as quick, short little blog entries. I have no idea what’ll happen, but I’ve sat on my hands long enough and it’s time for a change.

Terence Eden doesn’t understand the point of OAuth

Dossy Shiobara — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:10:37 +0000

This morning, my friend Marjolein Hoekstra (aka @CleverClogs) brings this blog entry by Terence Eden to my attention. In it, he suggests that Twitter’s OAuth is a “gaping security hole,” but what he really illuminates is that he totally does not understand the point of OAuth. Let me try and explain:

In the bad old days of Twitter only allowing HTTP Basic authentication, in order for third-party applications to access your Twitter account, you had to hand out your username and password. While this “worked” it wasn’t ideal. Why? Well, any time you changed your password — either to prevent an application from continuing to have access to your account, or out of good “security hygiene” practices of regularly changing your password — you had to go back to every application that you wanted to continue to work on your behalf. If you use more than a few applications, this quickly became a tedious process as you can imagine. Again, this was less than ideal.

Eventually, Twitter rolls out OAuth, an open implementation of a cross-service authorization scheme. Each application now requests authorization to act on a user’s behalf, and such access is now manageable per application rather than an all-or-nothing as it were with HTTP Basic auth. This is a huge win as this decouples the user’s Twitter credentials from a third-party application’s privileges to act on behalf of that user. You can now change your Twitter password to maintain good security hygiene without the inconvenience of having to update every third-party application with your new password. You can now revoke access from a single application without having to, again, update every other third-party application with your new password.

Terence, sadly, mistakes this radical improvement as a defect and a security flaw. What’s truly sad is that Terence even knows about the Twitter OAuth Connections page where one can de-authorize individual applications, yet he still missed the whole point and benefit of OAuth in the first place. How?

He suggests that “Changing a password should – in the minds of most people – mean that you need to re-enter your password even if you have previously authenticated yourself.” Is this true? Is this what “most people” (that means YOU) think? Please, let me know in the comments below if this is truly the case when you authorize an application using Twitter’s OAuth. If this is true, then the problem still isn’t what Terence suggests. It’s a matter of user education. Read this entry again and absorb the goodness that OAuth provides over HTTP Basic auth. for third-party applications. Do not fall victim to Terence’s FUD.

Dossy's Blog» Twitter

I hereby give myself permission to blog

Terence Eden doesn’t understand the point of OAuth