Archives for 2007

del.icio.us/dossy links since April 23, 2007 at 09:00 AM

del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since April 23, 2007 at 09:00 AM:

Voice communication is too low bandwidth for me

(… or, “Why I dislike using the phone so much“)

Those who know me know that I avoid the telephone whenever possible: I much prefer IM, email and other text-based communication methods. I bet people think I’m foolish; why would someone prefer to not use a phone, it’s so much faster than typing back and forth, plus you lose all that richness that comes with intonation and emotion that can be conveyed through voice? Someone so obsessed with efficiency like Dossy would obviously prefer the phone over text, right?

Wrong.

While you might have two ears, those ears aren’t independent: have you ever tried listening to multiple speakers simultaneously and follow what each of them are saying? It’s hard to do, for me at least. Audio communication is a synchronous, half-duplex, high-fidelity medium. In plain language, it means that while one person is speaking, the listeners should be listening. This is fine if you only have one conversation at a time. But, efficiency means parallelizing synchronous tasks.

Suppose for a moment that you could listen to multiple sources of audio simultaneously without any information loss. You still only have one mouth! If you’re going to speak, you can only say one thing at a time. If you’ve been in a situation where you’re speaking to several different people at a party simultaneously, you know how much this can slow down a conversation. You usually either break off from the group and have a series of quick one-on-one conversations, or you talk and listen to individual people in a round-robin fashion, or some other half-duplex synchronous strategy. It’s grossly inefficient.

But, you say, “typing is so slow!”

Sure, most people can’t touch type, but I’m not one of them. I type a solid 90-120 WPM. Of course, even half to a third that speed is sufficient for conversational typing which isn’t out of reach for the average typist. People refusing to learn how to type in this day and age are just dinosaurs: the current generation of youth will all likely be able to manage typing at 30-60 WPM.

If you think slow typing speed makes text chat a real chore, have you ever had to listen to a slow speaker? Or someone who mumbles or doesn’t enunciate well? That is just pure torture; I’d take a slow typist who makes lots of typos than have to sit through listening to a slow speaker who mumbles, any day.

You might argue, “fine, but what about the loss of information?”

I might have to concede here. You do lose a lot of information in text compared to audio: the intonation, the timing between words, the urgency in someone’s voice, the back-channel of emotions that subconsciously affect speech. A lot of that is lost when communication is limited to text. But, is this so bad? A lot of people use that extra information to manipulate the listener: a con is better perpetrated with a sad story told in tears; shouting can be used to intimidate others and bully them into complying. Frankly, in the exchange of ideas and knowledge, these bits are just distracting noise, masking the actual signal. I think losing them in text chat can sometimes be a benefit of the medium, not a limitation.

Frankly, the vocabulary of the average American is pathetic. It is so limited that in order to communicate, he will draw from his small pool of 300-400 words to try and get his idea across, rather than using a few choice words to succinctly and completely construct his message. This makes listening a slow and tedious process, and I’m notoriously impatient. Once I see where the speaker is going, I feel compelled to interrupt him to try and ease the pain. At least with store-and-forward text communication, the speaker can type at their own pace and I can read at mine, and respond without interrupting. It’s a full-duplex, asynchronous medium, unlike voice.

But what if I interrupt too soon? What if I actually misunderstood?

Sure, miscommunication happens. But, this isn’t limited to text chat–it happens in spoken conversation, too. However, with text, if I get the feeling I’ve misunderstood the other person, I can go back and re-read what they wrote verbatim as many times as I need to without interrupting them. With voice, I either have to use my imperfect short term memory to try and recall what was said and try to reinterpret it, or I have to interrupt the flow of dialog to ask for a clarification. It’s inefficient and error-prone. How could this be preferable?

I read a lot. I read and write code for a living. I read over 300 blogs in my aggregator. I probably spend 10-14 hours a day reading and writing text of various kinds. I can have 6-8 simultaneous IM conversations going on at any given time. I find that the more I read, the better I get at it: I read faster and I retain more information. Sometimes, when I’ve “misunderstood” a person, it’s because they were sloppy–they chose their words poorly–and I understood exactly what they said, but they didn’t say what they truly meant. Voice is ephemeral which likely encourages folks to be sloppy, but with text it’s possible to quickly scan what you just typed before you send it off to make sure it represents what you intended. When you’re used to being lazy with spoken language, the same laziness will likely carry over into your written language if you don’t write often enough. It is this laziness that has more often caused misunderstandings than my jumping to conclusions prematurely.

Okay, so this was a long-winded way of saying “the phone sucks.”

How did we go from “so clear, you could a pin drop” in the early 1990’s to “can you hear me now” and “the fewest dropped calls of any carrier” in the early 2000’s? Even if you want to still argue that the phone is superior to text chat and email, the telephone companies have already spoken with their business choices as to what direction things are going. I’m tired of suffering through the flaky, high-latency rubbish that’s being passed off as VoIP, today. It is absolute crap and we shouldn’t tolerate it any longer.

Fine, so what should we do about it?  Evolve, of course!

  • Learn to type. It’s the best investment of your time you can make right now, if you plan on living for the next 20 years or so. Typing is becoming more and more important as technology continues to improve.
  • Read more. Pick reading material that’s out side of your comfort zone. Deepen and enrich your vocabulary. Learn a new word or two every day.
  • Take pride in your ideas. Give them the care and attention they deserve. If you don’t think they’re worth the time, why would you expect me to spend mine on them?

If you’ve made it this far, thank you for reading. I hope I’ve gotten you thinking about how you communicate and ways you can improve and do it better. Or, perhaps you think I’m a crackpot and you just need to give me a piece of your mind. Go ahead and leave me a comment. I’d love to hear what you have to say.

Tags: , ,

Food porn: Sirloin steak with leeks in cream with potatos

Sirloin, leeks and potatos

So, tonight I was tormenting my Twitter pal _Brooke_ with some tasty food porn and Armughan commented about wanting a recipe.  I love to cook and I often create my own dishes using parts of other dishes that I’ve either had or have seen the recipe for … my own “recipe mashups” if you will.  What follows isn’t exactly a recipe, but more a narrative of how I cooked the meal pictured.

For the meat, I use Kikkoman Roasted Garlic Teriyaki marinade–it comes in a bottle with a purple label with a garlic on it.  I used maybe a few tablespoons of that in a freezer bag with the meat in it, just enough to evenly coat the meat with a very thin layer.  Seal up the bag and give it a good shake to make sure it’s really coated well.

The leeks I cut the green part off and clean then dissect in half, leaving behind just the white and yellow flesh.  Lay it “face down” in the pan (the cut side down), and take my grinders of Kosher sea salt and melange peppercorn over them.  Then, pour a cup to a cup and a half of heavy whipping cream over the leeks, coating them well.

Then, I just peel and quarter 6 small yellow potatos and rest them on top of the leeks and cream.  I think I may have sprinkled a little bit of salt over the potatos, too.

I start the grill getting it up to high heat, then start the leeks in pan on the bottom (direct heat) for 10 minutes.  (I always grill with the lid closed, only opening it to fiddle with what’s inside when I need to.)  Once the cream is bubbling, I reduce heat slightly but still keep it high and move the pan to the top rack for another 10 minutes.  At this point, the cream separates and what looks like clarified butter forms.  I use that clear liquid to baste the potatos so that they’ll roast nicely.

At this point, it’s time to grill the sirloin.  Take it out of the bag and throw it down on the bottom rack.  Sizzle.  Mmm.  Give it two minutes, then flip it over onto its other side.  Sizzle.  Mmm.  Flip it again, but this time lower the heat as low as the grill will go.  Give it around 8 minutes for a one inch thick piece, maybe 12-14 minutes for a 1.5 or 2 inch thick piece of meat.  Flip it onto its other side, give it the same amount of time.

You’re all done.  Turn off the grill, bring the food inside, slice the meat up thin–I try to get it as thin as 1-2mm thick slices–and enjoy!  It’s roughly 15 minutes of prep time followed by 45 minutes of cooking time.

Tags: , ,

If you work from home, where do you take your kids?

Take Our Daughters and Sons To Work day, April 26, 2007

It’s Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work day today, April 26, 2007.  It’s a great idea, but what if you’re like me, working 100% telecommute, from home?

Me: “Come here, kids, let me show you the home office!”

Kids: “Yes, Dad, we’ve seen it plenty of times.  All you do is sit in there in front of the computer.”

I guess this is an aspect about working in an office that I do miss, sometimes.

Tags: ,

del.icio.us/dossy links since April 16, 2007 at 09:00 AM

del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since April 16, 2007 at 09:00 AM:

PersonalDNA says I’m a free-wheeling experiencer

ME “Liz” Strauss blogged about a neat little personality test which reveals your “personalDNA”. For some reason, I love these little tests. Apparently, I’m a free-wheeling experiencer.

You are an Experiencer

Your inquisitive nature, imagination, and hands-on practicality make you an EXPERIENCER.

You are Free-Wheeling

Your charismatic nature, liveliness, and independence make you FREE-WHEELING.

Take the test and share your results in the comments below!  I’m curious to see what it says about you.

How do I “search my feeds” in Google Reader?

Optimistically, I decided to give Google Reader a try for a week, seeing if I could actually give up Bloglines for it. I knew there would probably be some small feature missing that would make me cringe when I realized Bloglines had it but Google Reader didn’t, but … I wasn’t expecting this to be it …

Google? How do I “search my feeds” in Google Reader?! I mean, I’m not kidding: when you think Google, the first thing that pops into my head is “search engine.” I completely took for granted that, you know, I’d be able to search within my subscribed feeds. I’m not talking a general Google Blog Search, but a search across all my feed subscriptions and only from my feed subscriptions.

Before you shake your head and say, “Oh, yet another stupid feature that will never get used,” let me tell you that I find myself using this feature plenty. I’m subscribed to lots of feeds in Bloglines (300+) and I read a lot of entries all throughout the day. I often skim the high volume feeds just to get through all of the new entries. People often ask me all sorts of questions which will trigger a memory of “I vaguely recall a blog entry about that” which then prompts me to search my Bloglines subscriptions so I can either read more about the subject and/or pass along a link to the asker.

Yes, the folks at Bloglines had the sense to provide a “search my feeds” functionality in their Bloglines search. Even better, they use a sane URL format (no stupid dicking around with an embedded AJAX widget) to access it, which lends itself very nicely for creating a “quick search” Firefox bookmark, which I immediately set up:

Bloglines 'search my feeds' Firefox quick search bookmark

So, all I have to do is hit Ctrl-T to open a new tab in Firefox, then type “bs <term>” in the Address bar, and I get a search results page for that term, limited to my subscribed feeds.

I could probably get used to not having the convenience of the quick search bookmark, if Google Reader only let me search within my subscribed feeds, somehow.

Am I missing something?  Is there a way to do this and I’m just missing it, or is it buried somewhere?  I can’t believe that the Google folks totally missed this feature, but I haven’t found it yet.

Update: Google Reader (finally) gets search-within-subscriptions (Sep 6, 2007)

Tags: , ,

I’m giving Google Reader a try

I’m a long-time user of Bloglines, a RSS feed reader. I always have a browser tab open, reading feeds throughout the day. But, after reading Gina Trapani’s article at Lifehacker, where she compares Bloglines to Google Reader, I’ve finally decided to give Google Reader a try.

Google Reader is a web-based feed aggregator/reader, just like Bloglines, but it’s user interface is done in the Gmail style.  It has its own quirks and the earlier version of it didn’t really make me want to switch, but my biggest complaint with Bloglines is that when you select a feed to read, it marks all the new entries as read–this can be really annoying with high-volume feeds with lots of new articles.

Moving my feeds over was easy: just export the OPML from Bloglines and import it into Google Reader.  Google Reader imported my feeds pretty nicely, and the whole tag/label scheme in in Google Reader is pretty nice.  Except: there’s no way to rename a tag?!  If you can, I sure can’t figure out how.

So, I’m going to give Google Reader a try, using it to read all my feeds for a week or two, to see if I really want to switch permanently.

Tags: , , ,

del.icio.us/dossy links since April 9, 2007 at 09:00 AM

del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since April 9, 2007 at 09:00 AM:

Easter, a time for rebirth, including websites

I was given some good news this Easter: I will take over maintenance of our church’s website, The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Our Saviour. Only just over a year ago, on December 11, 2005, I was baptized, and since then I’ve been playing guitar with the Sunday school kids and now I’m taking on the responsibility of the website.

I’ve moved all the site content into a WordPress setup. This should make it easier for me to keep it up to date and possibly enlist the help of other folks to add and update content on it. Here’s a screenshot of what the site looks like today, now that the new site is live:

Screenshot of oursaviourchurch.org, 2007-04-11

I may be biased, but I’d suggest if you’re looking for a Lutheran church in the area, do come visit us! All the information you need is available, right there on the website. If there’s something you can’t find, just ask.

Tags: , , ,