del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since July 14, 2008 at 09:00 AM:
-
Jessica Marotta’s two hour focaccia bread recipe.
-
An important lesson on quantitative comparisons, and why most “green eco-fags” have an emotionally, but not factually, compelling argument.
Posted by Dossy Shiobara in Links | No Comments »
del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since July 7, 2008 at 09:00 AM:
-
Postel’s Law: Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others.
-
Google discovers why AOL’s SNAC wins over XML for on-the-wire RPC – good on you, Google. Is Google’s version of FLAP coming next?
Posted by Dossy Shiobara in Links | No Comments »
I haven’t been actively reading my feeds, so when I fired up the reader today, I saw Bill Kocik’s pro-gun essay in his blog.
Personally, I:
- Do not own my own firearm.
- Do not like the idea of anyone using firearms.
- Recognize that firearms exist and will never go away.
- Believe that someone is less likely to perpetuate a violent crime if the odds that they will get shot in retaliation increases.
- Believe that in a world where guns are readily available, a steady equilibrium of safety will eventually be reached–perhaps, unfortunately, after much death by guns. Those left remaining and still alive will learn to co-exist safely together.
- Do not believe that fewer guns is the answer. As long as the balance of power leans in favor of criminals, no one can be safe.
- Am thankful that there are people who responsibly own and carry firearms, so that I don’t have to.
Wishing that we could live in a world without firearms is just that: wishful thinking. The reality is that guns have been invented and that can never be undone. The only rational path to safety is reaching the point where enough people are carrying firearms so that using one inappropriately will be dealt with swiftly and abruptly: with deadly force.
Tags: liberty, safety, firearms, guns, violence, crime
Posted by Dossy Shiobara in Blogosphere | 3 Comments »
… or, “Everything old is new again!“
Yesterday, Google announced Protocol Buffers, their data interchange format and API libraries. Before I say anything else, I want to say I’m glad they did it: it uses neither XML nor ASN.1, which means someone at Google has a clue.
What bothers me is that yet again, what was old is new again–their on-the-wire encoding of the data is simply TLV and AOL has been using SNAC/TLV for at least 15 years now. However, AOL’s SNAC/TLV covers a lot more use cases than what Protocol Buffers does. Then, there’s AOL’s FLAP transport for SNAC which Google hasn’t even approached. There’s still a lot more “work” that Google has to do–or, just use what AOL’s already proven works.
Of course, Google gets the community pat-on-the-back because they released this publically whereas AOL still has it hidden behind some proprietary lock and key. AOL, this is another technology opportunity missed: you could have continued to keep your internal, proprietary technology relevant if you’d simply opened this stuff up, first. Now, you’ll have to continue to replace it–at a huge sunk cost–with “standards-based implementations.” Oops.
In the end, I’m glad to finally see someone not blindly drinking the XML Kool-Aid. Maybe there’s hope, yet.
Tags: Google, AOL
Posted by Dossy Shiobara in AOL, Geeking out, Open Source | 2 Comments »
del.icio.us/dossy (RSS) links since June 30, 2008 at 09:00 AM:
Posted by Dossy Shiobara in Links | No Comments »
November 6th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Good question. I suspect the twitter user community who was accustomed to the old pre-oauth ways of dealing with authorization ...
November 5th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Another question that occurred to me -- how is this different than cookies allowing access to a site when browsing? ...
November 5th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
I agree with that option as well. It largely depends on what the outstanding tokens allow access to in my ...
November 5th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
I would paraphrase what Terrence said a bit: Most users expect that when you change your password, having known the ...
November 5th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Alex: That's a great analogy -- hopefully, that helps others understand why the "expected" behavior that Terence suggests is both ...